Legacy

1440 × 900

WXGA+ (Older MacBooks) · 16:10 · 1,296,000 pixels

About WXGA+ (Older MacBooks) Resolution

1440x900, classified as WXGA+ (Wide Extended Graphics Array Plus), is a 16:10 aspect ratio resolution that was once the default display resolution for Apple's MacBook and MacBook Pro laptops, as well as numerous PC monitors from the mid-2000s to early 2010s. This resolution occupies a significant place in computing history as the standard that accompanied the industry's transition from 4:3 to widescreen displays, and it represented the premium laptop resolution tier before 1080p panels became widely affordable. The 16:10 aspect ratio that defines 1440x900 was the original widescreen standard for computer monitors, predating the 16:9 ratio that would later dominate the market due to television industry influence. The extra vertical space compared to a 16:9 equivalent (1440x810) was valued by productivity users and creative professionals who benefited from the additional vertical pixels for document editing, web browsing, and design work. Apple, in particular, championed 16:10 displays throughout its product line, and the MacBook Pro 15-inch model shipped with a 1440x900 panel from 2006 through 2012. In the Windows PC world, 1440x900 was a popular resolution for 19-inch widescreen monitors during the LCD transition era. These monitors replaced the ubiquitous 17-inch CRT displays in offices and homes worldwide, and 1440x900 was the standard native resolution that these panels supported. Brands like Samsung, LG, Dell, and ViewSonic all produced numerous 19-inch models at this resolution, making it one of the most common desktop display resolutions of the late 2000s. From a usability perspective, 1440x900 offers a comfortable workspace that falls between 1366x768 and 1680x1050. The 900 vertical pixels provide meaningful extra space compared to 768, allowing for taller document views and less scrolling. For users working primarily in web browsers, email clients, or office applications, 1440x900 delivers an efficient layout without the need for excessive scrolling or window management. The decline of 1440x900 began around 2012-2013, driven by two concurrent trends. First, the cost of 1920x1080 panels dropped dramatically, making Full HD the new default for laptops and monitors at similar or lower price points. Second, the industry-wide shift to 16:9 aspect ratios, driven by the desire to simplify panel manufacturing for both TV and monitor markets, reduced the variety of 16:10 panels available. Apple's transition to Retina displays in 2012 further diminished 1440x900's presence in the premium laptop segment. Despite its reduced prominence in new hardware, 1440x900 retains relevance in macOS as an effective scaled resolution. Modern Retina MacBooks can display their desktops at an effective 1440x900 layout, using the additional physical pixels to render text and UI elements at double density. This 'Retina' mode at 1440x900 effective resolution delivers the same workspace as the original 1440x900 panels but with dramatically sharper rendering, bridging the old and new eras of Apple display technology. For web developers, 1440x900 continues to appear in analytics data, particularly from users on older Mac hardware or Windows desktops with legacy 19-inch monitors. Testing at this resolution helps ensure compatibility with an aging but still active segment of the display market, and the 16:10 aspect ratio can reveal layout issues that 16:9-only testing might miss.

Devices with 1440 x 900 Resolution

  • Apple MacBook Pro 15-inch (2006-2012)
  • Apple MacBook 13-inch (2006-2009)
  • Dell E1913S 19-inch Monitor
  • Samsung SyncMaster 940BW 19-inch
  • LG W1942S 19-inch Monitor
  • HP Compaq LA1951g 19-inch

Common Use Cases

  • Legacy Mac laptop workflows
  • 19-inch desktop monitor standard resolution
  • Scaled Retina display mode on modern MacBooks
  • Web design testing for 16:10 viewports

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did Apple use 1440x900 for so many years?

Apple chose 1440x900 because it provided an optimal balance of screen real estate and pixel density for the 15-inch MacBook Pro display size. The 16:10 aspect ratio offered more vertical space than 16:9 alternatives, aligning with Apple's emphasis on productivity and creative work. Apple maintained this resolution until the transition to Retina displays in 2012, when 2880x1800 panels replaced the older non-Retina screens.

Is 1440x900 the same as 1440p?

No, these are completely different resolutions. 1440x900 is a 16:10 resolution with 1,296,000 total pixels, while 1440p (2560x1440) is a 16:9 resolution with 3,686,400 total pixels — nearly three times as many. The confusion arises because both contain '1440' in their specifications, but this number refers to the width in 1440x900 and the height in 1440p.

What is the 16:10 aspect ratio and why did it decline?

16:10 was the original widescreen standard for computer monitors, offering 11% more vertical space than 16:9 at the same width. It declined because television manufacturers standardized on 16:9, and producing a single panel aspect ratio for both TVs and monitors was more economically efficient. The cost savings from unified 16:9 production lines ultimately outweighed the productivity benefits of 16:10 for most consumers.

Technical Specifications

Resolution1440 × 900
Common NameWXGA+ (Older MacBooks)
Aspect Ratio16:10
Total Pixels1,296,000
Pixel Density110 (15.4-inch display)
CategoryLegacy

Related Resolutions